Click here - to select or create a menu

Naval News

DSEI Japan 2023
  • News
  • Event News
    • SNA 2023
    • Euronaval 2022
    • Indo Pacific 2022
    • Sea Air Space 2022
    • DIMDEX 2022
  • Interviews
  • Videos
  • Advertising
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Home» News»Update on the U.S. Navy’s Littoral Combat Ship Program
littoral combat ships USS Freedom (LCS 1), left, and USS Independence (LCS 2)
SAN DIEGO (May 2, 2012) The first of class littoral combat ships USS Freedom (LCS 1), left, and USS Independence (LCS 2), maneuver together during an exercise off the coast of Southern California. The littoral combat ship is a fast, agile, networked surface combatant designed to operate in the near-shore environment, while capable of open-ocean tasking, and win against 21st-century coastal threats such as submarines, mines, and swarming small craft. (U.S. Navy photo by Lt. Jan Shultis/Released)

Update on the U.S. Navy’s Littoral Combat Ship Program

The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) was a “Hot Topic of discussion” at Surface Navy Association (SNA 2021) Virtual Symposium held in mid-January 2021 during the end of the President Trump Administration. The U.S. Navy discussed the status, plans, upgrades, new weapons, fixes, and Mission Packages of this troubled and often criticized program.

Peter Ong 04 Feb 2021

The U.S. Navy has Working Plans for these Warships.

Peter Ong story with additional reporting by Xavier Vavasseur.

Propulsion issues halt production of Freedom-class LCSs

In a statement to Defense News, the U.S. Navy pointed to “a material defect” with the ship’s combining gear, a complex transmission that transmits power generated by the ship’s engines to its waterjet propulsion system, and said it is working to design a fix for in-service littoral combat ships while holding off on taking delivery on new ships.

LCS 19 (St. Louis) Acceptance Trials. December 2019. Photographed by Lockheed Martin. The US Navy has halted deliveries of the monohull LCS until Lockheed Martin fixes the “material defect” in the combining gear (designed by the German firm RENK) that links the diesel and the gas turbine engines. Without the fix, the monohull LCS can’t achieve a top speed of 40+ knots and has to use its diesel engines for 10 to 12 kts.

“LCS Strike Team” created to address LCS Issues

According to VADM Roy Kitchener, USN, Commander, Naval Surface Forces/Commander, Naval Surface Force, U.S. Pacific Fleet, the U.S. Navy created a “LCS Strike Team” to study and analyze the maintenance, reliability, and lethality issues regarding these small warships.

RDML Casey Moton, USN, envisions giving more self-sufficiency to the LCS crews to make their own repairs and hopes to make quick progress addressing these maintenance issues. In addition, the U.S. Navy announced late last year that it would test Spearhead-Class EPF USNS Burlington as a maintenance and repair vessel for Littoral Combat Ships.

The “LCS Strike Team” is also in charge of a few studies, such as a “2016 LCS Study” addressing LCS issues with the crew, maintenance, and training.  This study is set to conclude soon while another study will address the lethality of the LCS.  Nonetheless, the Vice-Admiral did state that the U.S. Navy has to determine what missions the LCSs are suitable for to accomplish. VADM Kitchener believes in pushing out the LCS and sustaining the [shipyard construction] program as the VADM sees the LCSs as very useful platforms and plans to “Deliver [them] with a sustained plan.  We got to meet that requirement,” said VADM Kitchener.

LCS lethality upgrade

“Every LCS will get NSM. Gabby Giffords is doing the things that we want her to do. How do we make her more lethal?” 



VADM Roy Kitchener, USN, Commander, Naval Surface Forces, U.S. Pacific Fleet

All LCSs are slated to receive the Kongsberg/Raytheon Naval Strike Missile (NSM) such as the USS Gabrielle Gifford outfitted with eight angled NSM launchers behind the 57mm Bofors bow turret.

 

The U.S. Navy will base their LCS lethality upgrades on the “LCS Lethality Study.”  RDML Casey Moton, USN, explained that the NSM and Lethality Upgrades will be a permanent part of the LCSs and won’t be a swappable module.  Moton stated that NAVSEA intends for all LCSs to have the NSM and M53 NULKA active missile decoy capability added. (LCSs will also receive Electronic Warfare Countermeasures and armor to protect vital spaces).

While the NSM launchers will go behind the 57mm gun turret on the Independence-class trimarans, no mention was made on where to place the NSM launchers on the USS Freedom-class LCSs. Back at SNA 2019, Lockheed Martin showcased an “over the shoulder” configuration, with the launchers fitted forward, but aiming towards the back, as shown in the video above.

U.S. Navy intends for the LCS to replace the Patrol Coastal boats

The U.S. Navy plans to have the LCSs replace the Patrol Coastal (PC) Boats that are nearing their retirement age:

U.S. Navy Will Not Replace the Patrol Coastals with a New Boat of Similar Size and Type

However, do note that SNA 2021 was held virtually in mid-January 2021, in the waning days of the President Donald Trump Administration and before President-elect Joseph Biden took office on January 20th. Therefore, U.S. Navy decisions may change during the new Biden Administration’s four-year term.

Forward-deploying the LCS overseas

An excellent view of the LCS’s limited armament with a small MK VI Patrol Boat moored alongside. Even up-armed with eight NSMs behind the 57mm Bofors turret at the bow, the rear of the LCS is relatively unarmed, limited to an 11-cell SeaRAM launcher and perhaps .50cal machine guns. As such, the U.S. Navy is reluctant to forward-deploy or preposition LCSs around the world by themselves. US Navy photo.

When asked at the Virtual Symposium if the Littoral Combat Ships will be forward-deployed around the world, including the INDO-PACOM region, RADM Paul Schlise, USN, Director, Surface Warfare (N96) spoke frankly, “How many [LCS] do you want to go into your fight unarmed?” in which the Rear Admiral’s presentation partner, U.S. Marine General Tracy King agreed. The U.S. Navy acknowledges that the LCSs are currently under-armed without the addition of the eight Naval Strike Missile launchers, and will determine deployments based on the LCS Studies and the LCS Homeporting Plan. So far, RADM Schlise noted, that the U.S. Navy is satisfied with the current deployments and laydown of the LCS Homeports, including deploying to Singapore in the Western Pacific.

LCS MCM package and the expense of demining compared to the Avenger-class MCM vessels

Dealing With the Threat of Adversary Sea Mines
USS SCOUT (MCM 8). US Navy picture.

According to VADM Roy Kitchener, USN, Commander, Naval Surface Forces/Commander, Naval Surface Force, U.S. Pacific Fleet, the U.S. Navy says that the larger, faster, and better armed LCSs are taking over the demining missions often reserved for the Avenger-class MCM ships.

The Avenger-class Mine Warfare vessels are slow ships, with a top speed of 14 knots.  Avengers neutralize mines with the AN/SQQ-30 or AN/SQQ-32 mine detection sonar, depending on ship fit.  They are just armed with two .50cal M2HB Browning heavy machine guns on mounts.

“Once a mine is detected, the Avenger deploys an unmanned, tethered submersible called the EX116 Mod 0 (AN/SLQ-48) guided via a 3,500-long cable –that can dispose of mines with explosives, or by cutting cables connecting to mines to the seafloor or to their mooring rig just below the waves.  The Navy built 14 and 11 were in service as of August 2018, split between naval bases in Bahrain, Japan, and San Diego.  The first two of the ships, USS Avenger and Defender, decommissioned in 2014, while the Guardian, commissioned in 1989, struck a reef off the Philippines in 2013, ending the vessel’s career,” stated WARSHIPS, Guide to the US Navy, 2019.

Since WARSHIPS 2019’s publication in Fall, 2018, USS Ardent, Scout, and Champion have since been decommissioned in August 2020, bringing the total active-duty Avenger MCM vessel count to eight. But how effective, efficient, and expensive is using a LCS with a Mine Countermeasure (MCM) Mission Module Package compared to a slower and rapidly aging wood-covered-with-fiberglass hulled Avenger-class MCM ?

Organic/LCS-Based Mine Countermeasures (OMCM) Mission Package (MP) Systems. LCS Based MCM System Components. Propelled Expendable Neutralizer (Kill) Minefield Detection and Neutralization. Laser (Hunt) Airborne Mine Neutralization Near-Surface Upgrade. IOC: FY13/FOC: TBD. Assault Breaching System. IOC: FY13/FOC: FY22. Airborne Laser Mine Detection System. IOC: FY13/FOC: FY25. Buried Mine – Promising Potential. with Low Frequency Broad Band. Remote Minehunting System & MH-60S AN/AQS-20A. Airborne Mine Neutralization System. Unmanned Surface Sweep System / Organic Airborne and Surface Influence Sweep. Surface Mine Countermeasures. Unmanned Underwater Vehicle. and Low Frequency Broadband. Propelled Expendable Neutralizer (Kill) IOC: FY13/FOC: FY25. Sonar (Hunt) IOC: FY15/FOC: Magnetic/Acoustic Influence Sweep. Buried Mine Detection. IOC: FY16/FOC: FY24. RMS. IOC: FY15/FOC: FY25. AN/AQS-20A. IOC: FY12/ FOC: FY25. UISS. IOC: FY16/FOC: TBD. OASIS. IOC: FY14/ FOC: FY26.

Lieutenant Roxanne Sumanga of the MCM Naval Mine Warfare school replied as to how expensive it is to operate the LCS with a MCM Package on demining operations:

“Bottom line: It’s expensive, the reasons being that some of these systems on the LCS Mission package have technologies that have not yet existed so we have to research and we have to look into these technologies and build them up and that cost money. I think that anything that is new and shiny is going to initially cost money.  And when the systems are in full production and fully fielded, it will drive down the cost, but for now it’s expensive and that is just the nature of Acquisitions in buying something new.”



Lieutenant Roxanne Sumanga

Naval News also asked how faster the LCS can neutralize mines compared to the Avenger MCMs that the LCS is replacing in this role:

“The time piece is a little bit more tricky.  So generally as MCM Officers, we’re always working against time.  So regardless of platform, regardless of systems, we can always finish faster. The question is how much risk are you willing to inter?  [Example] So we can take a channel [and] clear it in 10 days, [and do it] by 7 [days].  Are you willing to sail through a channel with 40% risk?  So the time piece is relative.
Now as far as LCS goes…to say that is it getting faster or more time consuming…  Today, it is clear and faster because we have [MCM] systems [that the LCS] didn’t have five years ago.  Five years into the future, we should have these [LCS MCM] systems, if managed correctly, that you can employ all at once.
Compare the LCS to the MCM Avengers. If the Avenger acquires a mine via sonar, it can do a run to detonate the mine.  With an LCS using unmanned systems, the LCS sends out the drone, gathers the data, analyzes it, and if questionable, sends out the drone again, do a different pattern to gather more data and then analyzes it again, and then send out a system to neutralize the mine.  So, for an Avenger that can detect and destroy a mine in four hours, it might take the LCS an entire day and that is because the LCS cannot do a single sortie to detect and engage and relies on unmanned systems. So, it’s like comparing apples to oranges when you look at the LCS and the Avenger.  But looking forward, I think that the LCS, when compared to the LCS itself, the LCS [of today] can clear [mines] faster [than an LCS five years ago with immature and untested MCM packages].”



LT Sumanga of the MCM Naval Mine Warfare school

LCS Littoral Combat Ship SNA 2021 US Navy 2021-02-04
Tags LCS Littoral Combat Ship SNA 2021 US Navy
Facebook Twitter Stumble linkedin Pinterest More

Authors

Posted by : Peter Ong
Peter Ong is a Freelance Writer with United States and International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) media credentials and lives in California. Peter has a Bachelor's Degree in Technical Writing/Graphic Design and a Master's Degree in Business. He writes articles for defense, maritime and emergency vehicle publications.

Related Articles

US Navy’s 25th LCS delivered by Lockheed Martin

US Navy’s 25th LCS delivered by Lockheed Martin

Naval News Staff 06 Feb 2023
The US Navy accepted delivery of the future USS Marinette (LCS 25) from Lockheed Martin last week at the Fincantieri Marinette Marine shipyard in Marinette, Wisconsin.
At-sea rearming deemed a “Main Priority” by SECNAV

At-sea rearming deemed a “Main Priority” by SECNAV

Aaron-Matthew Lariosa 02 Feb 2023
Secretary of the Navy (SECNAV) Carlos Del Toro once again emphasized the need for at-sea reloading at this year’s Combat Systems Symposium.
U.S., International Forces Seize Illegal Drugs in Gulf of Oman

U.S., International Forces Seize Illegal Drugs in Gulf of Oman

Naval News Staff 01 Feb 2023
A USGC vessel seized illegal drugs worth a total of $33 million from a vessel transiting international waters in the Gulf of Oman, Jan. 30.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Legal / Privacy Policy
About Us
Contact Us

Copyright © 2022 Naval News
All Rights Reserved
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok